Monday, August 11, 2025

SAME AS .......................

 


Listen .........i   have  absolutely no problem with same sex  couples ........ and  whatever  makes you happy  ....but  i think  ........ marriage   should be   for the traditional route   .....let others  call it a    CIVIL UNION .........marriage is   sacred in many,...... many ......... cultures ........and  countries ......... i do not  give a  flying  fuck .........i think marriage is  total  fucking  bullshit  ...... all around  waste  of  money........ and   said it many..... many...... times  an  expensive  day for the  father... ....where he hands over  his  daughter ........ to a  guy  you know  he  never  ever  liked ...... but has  no  fucking choice .........  especially if the mother  likes  him......... you  know  he  knows  he is  porking his  daughter ......once he hands over his  daughter   she is  gone  ...and  he  can say whatever   he  wants  to the  dad .....it's really fucking  stupid   marriage  ........but it was  made up  for  the  sole principal of money .........once  the father has  handed the daughetr  over .......... the  guy   can tell the  dad he is  going to fuck the  shite out of his  daughter ........ now his  wife ....... and he cannot  do a  fucking  thing about it ......it's now  his wife  she is  gone !!!!!!!.......no more  daddy's girl....... unless they divorce....... and she moves  back home .....  ....FFS  !!!!!!  once  you get rid of  kids ....... who  the   fuck wants them back !!!!!! ......really ....!!!........that's just me....... i never  had  family....... nor  wanted  family neither .......  nothing but a fucking pain in the  arse ........but they should  change it to civil union or not  who cares i don't   but   it   is  biblically between a  man and  a  women ..........but hey !!!!!!if a guy and a  guy is  happy   ...and a  girl and  a  girl  is  happy  ......then  it's all good .........simple ......goddy gumdrops .......



Yahoo News

Could the Supreme Court overturn same-sex marriage? This case hopes to roll back the ruling that made it legal.

Kim Davis, a former Kentucky county clerk who was jailed after refusing to file marriage licenses for same-sex couples, is hoping to overturn the Obergefell v. Hodges decision.

3 min read
Two wedding rings on a rainbow flag.
Same-sex marriage was legalized in 2015, but a new court case seeks to challenge it. (Getty Creative)

The Supreme Court is being asked to hear a case that seeks to undo the 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges decision, which allowed same-sex couples to get married.

This challenge of Obergefell, the first since 2015, comes from Kim Davis, a former Kentucky county clerk who was jailed in 2015 after being held in contempt for refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. Davis, who refused to file the marriage licenses due to her religious beliefs, is appealing a damages verdict against her: a $100,000 jury verdict for emotional damages plus $260,000 for attorneys’ fees. Now she is taking her case to the Supreme Court on the grounds that Obergefell was wrongly decided and infringes on her First Amendment rights.

This is not the first time Davis has attempted to overturn the damages against her. In 2019, she petitioned the Supreme Court to dismiss the lawsuit, but the court declined to hear her case. More recently, in 2025, a panel of judges from the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals also rejected her claims.

Davis’s challenge is concerning to LGBTQ advocates, as overturning Obergefell could undo the legal right to same-sex marriage. That 2015 ruling stated that same-sex couples must be allowed to marry and that all states must recognize those marriages. At the time, Davis’s court battle was a direct challenge to Obergefell — but the ruling held.

But now Liberty Counsel, the conservative group representing Davis, is asking the Supreme Court to overturn both the Sixth Circuit decision and the Supreme Court’s initial decision in Obergefell.

Mat Staver, Liberty Counsel’s founder and chair, stated that Davis’s case “underscores why the U.S. Supreme Court should overturn the wrongly decided Obergefell v. Hodges opinion, because it threatens the religious liberty of Americans who believe that marriage is a sacred union between one man and one woman.”

Could same-sex marriage really be overturned? What would that mean?

The new makeup of the Supreme Court could favor Davis. Since 2015, the Supreme Court has become more conservative, with three justices — Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett — appointed by President Trump during his first term. While this does not necessarily mean the conservative majority would rule in Davis’s favor, should the court choose to take her case, the latest request sounded alarm bells for many LGBTQ advocates.

And there is recent precedent for overturning previously decided court cases. For example, the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, ending federal protection for abortion rights after nearly 50 years. In his concurring opinion of the 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson decision, which overturned Roe, Justice Clarence Thomas stated that the court should reconsider Obergefell and other cases related to rights based on the Constitution’s due process clause.

Should Obergefell be overturned, 32 states have laws on the books that would ban same-sex marriage — though, thanks to a 2022 federal law, they would still have to recognize unions that were already legally performed. Then-President Joe Biden signed the Respect for Marriage Act, which overturned the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act and ensured federal recognition of same-sex and interracial marriages. However, the law does not force states to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples.




No comments:

  I am not.......  and never have been....... a lover of   any kind of  beer........  it looks like urine ......... foams  like  urine.........