Skip to main content

of course ...its a no brainer .......

When you go into a hairdresser get you hair cut ......its a personal experience to your shrink........... your hairdresser the one you tell all your shit to ........well i do .......just enough that is ........ not enough to stand up in court and testify against me !!!!obviously.....but these are like massage therapists...... they are intimate with you you are in close proximity with the's going to be hard to nail down........ this  shit  .......until it;s all gone......... then people will still be edgy scared  ........we  have had  to adjust change adapt  .....the last hurrah  !!!!!!!was 2019 ........we had the fuck.......... the fun is gone ....... concerts ........... having one on one with your hairdresser ....the ship has sailed.......... its all face mask ......fear  and  cleanliness  and  .stupid fucking rules ........

Hairdressers may be passing on Covid to customers because of 'inadequate' visors, ministers warned

Edward Malnick


Hairdressers and barbers could be inadvertently transmitting Covid-19 to their customers as a result of "inadequate" official guidance stipulating that they should wear visors rather than masks, government advisers have warned.
Scientists have expressed fears that plastic face shields being used by workers in hair salons provide insufficient protection for the wearer and client because they leave a significant gap through which small airborne coronavirus droplets could pass.
In the NHS, visors are generally only used in addition to masks, as only the masks are specifically designed to cover the nose and mouth.
The Telegraph understands that scientists raised concerns about the equipment worn by hairdressers and barbers in the latest meeting of The New and Emerging Respiratory Virus Threats Advisory Group (Nervtag) on Friday, as well as in a recent meeting of at least one sub-committee of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage). Ministers are facing calls from Sage and Nervtag scientists to require barbers and hairdressers to wear masks or face coverings - either alone or with visors as well.
Swiss authorities raised concerns about the use of visors alone last month after an outbreak among staff at a hotel. All of those who became infected wore plastic visors, while those wearing masks came out unscathed.
Prof Mark Wilcox, a professor of medical microbiology who attends Sage and two of its sub committees, said: "I don't think the guidance is correct and I don't understand why visors were chosen in preference to masks.
"We have, in several settings, discussed the issue of masks versus visors and I think it would be fair to say that I am not alone in these views. My colleagues both in those settings and in other settings share my views.
"I've not come across somebody who has said that visors are the best thing."
Dr Ben Killingley, a consultant in infectious diseases who sits on Nervtag, said: "I don't know where it came from, where someone decided that just wearing a visor for hairdressers alone would be enough. That doesn't make sense to me.
"A visor is primarily worn to protect workers from splashes. It does the same job as goggles, protecting the eyes. No healthcare worker would ever wear a visor without a mask.
"You would have thought for their own protection and just in case they have been infected themselves, they should be wearing a mask themselves. In my view, both to protect the hairdresser and the person coming in, just wearing a visor alone is not enough."
Nervtag is understood to have discussed the issue after Prof Peter Openshaw, one of its members, tweeted his concerns, having had a haircut by a barber wearing a face shield.
"His expelled breath and droplets were directed down onto me," Prof Openshaw tweeted. "Zero protection, I'd say." He added that while his own mask provided protection against possible viral droplets, it would have failed to prevent "corneal seeding", or Covid-19 particles entering his eyes.
On Friday, Boris Johnson expanded the number of venues at which members of the public will have to wear face coverings, to include hair salons and barbers, along with museums, galleries, cinemas and places of worship for the first time from August 8.
Dr Killingley cited a study in the US which found that no Covid-19 cases were reported among 139 clients who were exposed to two asymptomatic hair stylists in Missouri. Both of the stylists were wearing surgical masks or cotton face coverings at each appointment, as were their clients.
Prof Wilcox said the study was "some of the best evidence that I've seen to date validating the usefulness of masks to prevent transmission of virus."
Dr Killingley, who sits on Sage's environmental working group, said he understood why visors were "attractive" to those in "customer-facing" roles, because, unlike masks and coverings, they leave workers' entire faces visible. They are also used by many bar and restaurant staff. But visors "are not as good a tool for stopping infection transmission" in a barbers or hair salon, he insisted.
Currently, government advice to those providing "close contact services" such as hairdressers, barbers and beauty salons, states: "Clearly, when providing close contact services, it often may not be possible to maintain social distancing guidelines (2m, or 1m apart with risk mitigation, is acceptable). As a result, personal protective equipment in the form of a visor will be required to mitigate the risk."
The NHBF, the trade body for hairdressers, beauty salons and barbers, states on its website: "Clients may wear face coverings if they wish and staff can wear a face covering in addition to a visor, but not instead of one." The NHBF said it relied on the Government for advice about personal protective equipment.
Last month, Switzerland's Federal Office of Public Health said it had found increased infections among people who only wore face shields.
A Government spokesman said: “Advice for hairdressers remains unchanged and is that they should continue to wear visors.


Popular posts from this blog

geez there is a shocker

Gee ya think only 43 pissed of with china ../////I would think the planet would be  fucking pissed at their  shennanigans ……….  43 countries criticize China at UN for repression of Uyghurs EDITH M. LEDERER Thu, October 21, 2021, 5:51 PM UNITED NATIONS (AP) — More than 40 mainly Western countries criticized China at a U.N. meeting on Thursday for the reported torture and repression of Uyghurs and other religious and ethnic minorities in Xinjiang, keeping a spotlight on the region where foreign governments and researchers say an estimated 1 million people or more have been confined in camps. Cuba followed immediately with a statement on behalf of 62 countries saying what happens in Xinjiang is China’s internal affair, and dismissing all allegations as based on “political motivation” and “disinformation.” China’s U.N. Ambassador Zhang Jun spoke soon after, denouncing “the groundless accusations” and unfounded “lies” and accusing the United States and a few other unnamed signatories of the

michael guist of swamp people dies....

Well Michael Guist of the swamp people , died...apparently he  fell over the side of the boat....... Personally i did not think he was that  famous..... But apparently  the history channel  did  three seasons  on people  living in the bayou ......who the hell would wants to live there ). Now as i see it is  absolute ,shit  apart  from a  few, i mean a a few  channels,......... But i got to thinking, is  the history channel  so desperate all they can do is  film a reality TV about  people living in a  swamp....... This  shows you how bad reality TV has gotten ,when the history channel and  the swamp has  nothing to do with history.......well it  could be  if you look at how old it is , but  its  not about the age of the swamp its about people living in swamp ........ Are people reaching an all time low  here in  media, i mean what the hell exciting can be done in a swamp    apart from dying of course  that's up there ...... But the swamp ...i mean  how  do these  guy

well middle of the road

  As i do not like the smell of  weed/dope/ reminds me of  too many things .....but that's not all....... i  cannot get rid of the smell in places  like cigarettes ......but that in not the  crux of the rant........weed  does something to the transponders  ........although i guess it has  spawned  many songs/babies/deaths/symphonies we all know conductors are stoners....... ......paintings /artwork/car crashes ........fuck -ups /and of  course the legendary munchies .........i once  watched  a man  devour a mixing bowl of rice krispies ....high as fuck ......epic performance !!!!!!....we never   had  man versus food then .......but that would be a  winner .....but weed it has  its pros and cons ....i don't like it .....never  have  ...i don't like putting smoke or  things in my lungs ....i don't like  getting high usually leads  to paranoia...and i get leery best left alone i think .......if i get high  am not in control and that is not